California Politics


LACDP endorsed the following candidates for the June 3, 2008 Elections:

* Incumbent

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Board of Supervisors
Supervisor, Dist. 2    Mark Ridley-Thomas

Superior Court Judges
Office No.   4    Ralph W. Dau*
Office No. 69    Harvey A. Silberman
Office No. 72    Hilleri Grossman Merritt
Office No. 82    Cynthia Loo
Office No. 84    Lori-Ann C. Jones
Office No. 94    C. Edward Mack
Office No. 95    Patricia D. Nieto
Office No. 119   Jared D. Moses
Office No. 123   Kathleen Blanchard
Office No. 125   James N. Bianco
Office No. 154   Rocky L. Crabb

CITY ELECTIONS

City of Cerritos - Special Election
City Council    Mark Pulido

City of Torrance
City Council    Gene Barnett*
City Council    Pat Furey
City Council    Tim Goodrich
City Council    Cliff Numark

Endorsements issued by the LACDP in local and municipal races become the official endorsements of the California Democratic Party.

Below are the official California Democratic Party endorsements in Congressional, State Senate, and State Assembly races:

U.S. CONGRESS

CD26 Russ Warner
CD27 Brad Sherman*
CD28 Howard Berman*
CD29 Adam Schiff*
CD31 Xavier Becerra*
CD32 Hilda Solis*
CD33 Diane Watson*
CD34 L. Roybal-Allard*
CD35 Maxine Waters*
CD36 Jane Harman*
CD37 Laura Richardson*
CD38 Grace Napolitano*
CD39 Linda Sanchez*
CD46 Debbie Cook

STATE SENATE

SD17 Bruce McFarland
SD19 Hannah-Beth Jackson
SD21 Carol Liu
SD27 Alan Lowenthal*
SD29 Joseph Lyons

STATE ASSEMBLY

AD36 Linda Jones
AD38 Carole Lutness
AD39 Felipe Fuentes*
AD41 Julia Brownley*
AD42 Michael Feuer*
AD43 Paul Krekorian*
AD44 Anthony Portantino*
AD45 Kevin DeLeon*
AD46 John Perez
AD47 Karen Bass*
AD48 Mike Davis*
AD49 Mike Eng*
AD50 Hector de la Torre*
AD51 Curren Price*
AD52 Linda Harris- Forster
AD53 Ted Lieu*
AD54 Bonnie Lowenthal
AD55 Warren Furutani*
AD56 Tony Mendoza*
AD57 Ed Hernandez*
AD58 Charles Calderon*
AD59 Don Williamson
AD60 Diane Singer
AD61 Norma Torres

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

Spring 2008 Issues Forum

Saturday, May 10, 2008
9:30 AM - 4:30 PM

IATSE Local 80 Union Hall
2520 W. Olive Ave., Burbank

Lunch Provided

RSVP 213-382-4111 or ClarkLee@lacdp.org

Understanding Key Democratic Issues and the Message to Win

Winning the War by Ending the War
Lila Garrett - KPFK Pacifica Radio
Wade Sanders - Combat Veteran and Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy
Brad Parker - California Democratic Party Progressive Caucus
Tim Goodrich - Iraq Veterans Against the War

Perspectives on Education: Teachers, Parents and the Public
Joel Jordan - United Teachers Los Angeles
John McDowell - Los Angeles College Faculty Guild
Scott Folsom - California State PTA
Heidi von Szeliski - Heidi von Szeliski & Associates

A Fair and Just Society?
Rabbi Allen Freehling - Los Angeles City Human Relations Commission
Cynthia Buiza - Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights of Los Angeles
Elizabeth Badger - Minority Outreach Committee

What You Need to Know About Women and Voting - The Facts and the Fallacies
Lyn Shaw - California Democratic Party Women’s Caucus
Heidi von Szeliski - Heidi von Szeliski & Associates
Teri Holoman - The Holoman Group
Yvette Martinez - Progressive Strategy Partners

REPUBLICANS TRY TO STEAL WHITE HOUSE… AGAIN!
The Republican Party is in serious trouble, so they are back to their old tricks again – trying to steal the White House. Realizing that most Americans have had enough of the corrupt and inept rule of George Bush and his Republican cronies in the Congress, they know the only way they can keep control of the White House is by dirty-dealing.
They’ve cooked up yet another scheme - this time they want to hijack California’s ballot boxes, cheat the electoral process and steal the White House, again.

 

Please CLICK HERE TO CONTRIBUTE and help us spread the word and protect California’s voice in choosing the next president.

 

 

 

 

In California and 47 other states, Electoral College votes are awarded “winner-take-all.” The candidate with the most votes gets the Electoral College votes. 
California is the Electoral College mother lode, with 55 of the 270 votes required to win the White House, more than 20% of the total. Because California is a blue state, it offsets Republican dominance across the South and parts of the Midwest and gives Democrats a chance to win the White House.
Without California’s 55 Electoral votes, it would be virtually impossible for any Democrat to win the presidency, making it essential for us to carry California and making our state a high priority target for Republican shenanigans.
 

So what do the Republicans do? Try to change the rules in mid-game!

 

The California Republican Party is trying to qualify an initiative for the June ballot that would alter the way California awards its Electoral votes to a congressional district basis, ensuring themselves 20 more Electoral votes – equal to the state of Ohio – ensuring four more years of disastrous Republican rule in the White House.

 

This cannot be allowed to happen!! If you want healthcare for every American, livable wages for working people, clean air and water, aggressive action to combat global climate change, a judicial system that protects all of our rights, and an end to the war, we must win back the White House next year.
We must defeat this hostile threat to our votes and the future of our government. The LACDP needs your support to spread the word and counter this Republican dirty trick. Please click here to contribute to YOUR Democratic Party.
Together, we can stop the Republicans’ latest fraud against the American people and prevent them from stealing the White House – again!
The media has come out in force against this elephant-sized partisan plot. Even the conservative Orange County Register said “… it is nakedly partisan and profoundly subversive of our constitutional system.” Click here to see a list of over 14 newspaper editorials against the initiative.
 
The California Democratic Party has started “fraudbusters,” to beat this plot.

  Click here to learn more about fraudbusters or to sign up.

 
 Had enough Republican corruption and incompetence?
Help us turn the White House into a “Blue House” next November…
but first we must defeat the Republican plot to Steal Our State!

 

 CLICK HERE TO CONTRIBUTE

 

Health Reform and the Year of Magical Thinking
by Senator Sheila James Kuehl

The Year of Magical Thinking is the title of a memoir by Joan Didion detailing her state of denial, inexplicable behaviors and, finally, coming to grips with, the death of her husband. It’s also an apt description of the Governor’s 2007 approach to reforming our broken healthcare system, with the glaring difference that he still hasn’t come to grips with the truth. (After all, if a complicated movie plot could be resolved in less than two hours, why not fix healthcare in California in nine months?)

Beginning in January, the Governor ordered his health advisors to sketch the outlines of a plan that would magically “cover” all Californians by simply requiring them to buy health insurance. To this moment, he has refused to negotiate any of his major points with the Legislature. The language for his plan was finally drafted five months later, and shown, under wraps, to a few, select people. Not one legislator agreed with it, and no one would carry the bill as legislation.

To fill the void raised by the Governor’s magical “we must do something this year” drumbeat, the Democratic leaders began crafting their own reform plan. To date, however, the Governor and the Legislative leadership have remained oceans apart on the broad policy strokes of health care while public support for the current insurance-company controlled system has plummeted and support for the reforms contained in SB 840, the Medicare-like fix for California, has grown.

Now, with less than two weeks remaining in the first half of the two-year legislative session, there is still no “something” on the table and the Governor, like a Barnum and Bailey’s ring leader, continues to announce that he will, assuredly, pull a rabbit out of a black hat. Actually, there is no way of knowing if the result would really be a rabbit; it could just as easily be an albatross.

The Governor has further limited discussion by announcing that he would veto both of the legislative proposals that have actually been introduced as real bills. SB 840, by far the most carefully crafted, transparent and fully vetted bill, will remain in the Legislature until next year, since sending it down to him for a veto would end any consideration of single payer until 2009. The individual mandate provisions in the Governor’s pronouncement are being emphatically rejected by virtually all stakeholders representing the people who would be forced to pay uncapped premiums. The percentages to be paid by employers and individuals, hospitals and doctors, people in a “pool” and those outside, those above differing percentages of the poverty scale and those below, are so far apart in the Governor’s pronouncements and the Speaker’s bill, you could drive trucks through the gaps. The Governor’s lynchpin financial mechanism of a provider tax remains submerged under the very murky water of a 2/3 vote. What convoluted compromise might be devised in a last-minute attempt is anyone’s guess.

Nonetheless, we are told that, unless we agree to pass a yet-to-be hastily drafted bill that incidentally may be the biggest reform proposal ever attempted in health care, and pass it in two weeks, thus completely bypassing the entire political process and any semblance of open public input, we’ve completely failed and health reform is doomed forever. Please.

The prospect of legislative staff, sitting behind closed doors, hastily crafting a 100-page health reform “compromise”, to be pushed through the legislature with little or no public input over the course of the next 14 days, is deeply irresponsible. Frankly, given the example of the energy deregulation bill, we ought to know better.

Moreover, we lose nothing by taking advantage of the fact that the sessions of the California legislature are two year sessions. Many of our major accomplishments, most recently, AB 32, the bill related to greenhouse gas, took more than one year to achieve. Next year’s Presidential campaigns will ensure that health reform stays as the top of the agenda. More importantly, the issue of health reform will continue to dominate because the people need it and want it. What they want, and deserve, however, is responsible health reform, not a new debacle that benefits the health insurance companies the way the electricity bill benefited Enron.

Finally, we must not forget the reason that we are in this crisis to begin with. Health care premiums changed by insurance companies continue to grow 3-4 times faster than wages. A solution is needed that pays attention to adequate funding, affordability, cost controls and quality.

Even if the Legislature should pass a last minute convoluted experiment in health reform, there will still be a need to continue the work to enact a fully vetted, Medicare-like single payer system that replaces the insurance companies with a plan for all Californians, allows each person to choose their own providers, and protects affordability, comprehensive coverage and quality. Such a solution is the only sensible and tested way to achieve universal health care responsibly. Whatever happens in the next two weeks, the movement for single payer universal health care is continuing to grow, and SB 840 will continue as its focal point, the only legislation that establishes the kind of truly universal, modern and affordable health care system the people of California need and deserve.

For more information, please go to Senator Kuehl’s website at www.sen.ca.gov/kuehl

Statement from California Democratic Party Chairman Art Torres calling on Governor Schwarzenegger to sign SB 924, allow voters to voice their opinion on Iraq

“Regardless of the Governor’s views on the war in Iraq, California voters deserve the right to have their voices be heard. In this war that has now claimed more than 3,700 American troops, Californians have suffered the largest toll, having lost more than 400 of our own in Iraq.

“Recent polling shows that two out of three Californians support either withdrawing some or all of the U.S. troops now stationed in Iraq.

“The self-proclaimed ‘People’s Governor’ owes it to the people of California, our troops and their loved ones to let the voice of the voters be heard.”

# # #

Following is an editorial from today’s Orange County Register:

Let Californians be heard on Iraq
There’s no good reason not to have a referendum on the Feb. 5 ballot.
An Orange County Register Editorial

It is difficult to imagine what great harm would be done by having a measure on California’s ballot in February calling on President Bush to begin the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. It would provide a snapshot of public opinion on what is shaping up to be the key national issue of the day. And it could spark more discussion among the people rather than the politicians.

The state Assembly voted Monday to put such a referendum on the Feb. 5 ballot. Since the Senate passed a slightly different version in June, it has been sent back to the Senate. Once the Senate agrees, it will go the Gov. Schwarzenegger’s desk for signature or veto. The governor hasn’t made up his mind and is said to be a little leery of having to address the issue.

He should go ahead and sign it.

One of the consequences of never having had a formal declaration of war (as we still believe the Constitution requires) before invading Iraq is that the kind of far-ranging discussion that should have preceded such a drastic step was short-circuited. A referendum in California would have no power to bind or mandate the president. But it would offer him and his advisers important information about how the people view the Iraq war almost five years on. Not that California is necessarily representative of the nation as a whole, but the views of Californians are not unimportant.

The most childish reason to oppose putting such a referendum on the ballot is the argument that even discussing the idea of troop withdrawal will hurt morale in the military in Iraq and perhaps even endanger the troops. There’s little or no reason to suspect this is true. We’ve read interviews with soldiers and Marines who support the mission passionately. We’ve read interviews with military people in Iraq who have become deeply disillusioned with the war – or convinced that the Iraqi people don’t want what America is offering as badly as the administration wants to offer it – and would welcome immediate withdrawal. We’re in no position to know the precise breakdown, but soldiers in Iraq have more than one monolithic viewpoint.

The one thing we’re quite sure of us that whatever they may think privately of their mission, the men and women on duty in Iraq are professional and well-trained enough that learning some people back home are questioning the wisdom of the war will not turn them into quivering blobs of self-pity and remorse who simply won’t be able to carry on. They have much more important (and threatening) things to worry about. The notion that their morale would crumble if such a referendum were held is a profound insult to them.

Even if a referendum on the war will have no immediate practical effect, it will provide valuable information. If it helps to inspire more wide-ranging and passionate (but civil and informed, we hope) discussion and debate, it will serve the purpose of strengthening civil society back home.

Governor Signs 2007-08 Budget

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the 2007-08 Budget into law on Friday, August 24. The Governor vetoed $703 million in General Fund spending, extensively cutting healthcare and socila service programs.

A new California Budget Project summary reviews the Governor’s vetoes, changes in the final budget agreement as compared to the plan passed by the Assembly in July, and reviews key policy changes in the budget.

To read more go to www.cbp.org

To link directly to the Governor’s summary of the 2007-08 Budget and a listing of his vetoes go to: http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/pdf/Enacted/BudgetSummary/FullBudgetSummary.pdf.