Democratic Party Chair Howard Dean delivered the following Democratic precepts at the National Baptist Convention on September 6, 2007:

Governor Dean said, “We know what moral issues are about . . . As Democrats we believe:

1. That no child should go to bed hungry.

2. As Democrats we believe that it is a moral issue that we no longer be the last industrialized country on the face of the Earth that doesn’t have health care for every single person. And we have acted on that in Congress by giving every child under 18 health insurance.

3. That war should be a last resort only after diplomacy has been exhausted.

4. That we should properly equip our troops before we send them to war.

5. That we should properly take care of our veterans when they come home.

6. That everyone deserves equal rights under the law.

7. That we should be good stewards of the Earth.

8. That hardworking people should earn a living wage and be able to take care of their families.

9. That we shouldn’t pass debt onto our children and our grandchildren.

10. That faith should not be used to divide people.

11. That you and I have more in common than we have differences.

Editors note: Nothing more need be said.

Health Reform and the Year of Magical Thinking
by Senator Sheila James Kuehl

The Year of Magical Thinking is the title of a memoir by Joan Didion detailing her state of denial, inexplicable behaviors and, finally, coming to grips with, the death of her husband. It’s also an apt description of the Governor’s 2007 approach to reforming our broken healthcare system, with the glaring difference that he still hasn’t come to grips with the truth. (After all, if a complicated movie plot could be resolved in less than two hours, why not fix healthcare in California in nine months?)

Beginning in January, the Governor ordered his health advisors to sketch the outlines of a plan that would magically “cover” all Californians by simply requiring them to buy health insurance. To this moment, he has refused to negotiate any of his major points with the Legislature. The language for his plan was finally drafted five months later, and shown, under wraps, to a few, select people. Not one legislator agreed with it, and no one would carry the bill as legislation.

To fill the void raised by the Governor’s magical “we must do something this year” drumbeat, the Democratic leaders began crafting their own reform plan. To date, however, the Governor and the Legislative leadership have remained oceans apart on the broad policy strokes of health care while public support for the current insurance-company controlled system has plummeted and support for the reforms contained in SB 840, the Medicare-like fix for California, has grown.

Now, with less than two weeks remaining in the first half of the two-year legislative session, there is still no “something” on the table and the Governor, like a Barnum and Bailey’s ring leader, continues to announce that he will, assuredly, pull a rabbit out of a black hat. Actually, there is no way of knowing if the result would really be a rabbit; it could just as easily be an albatross.

The Governor has further limited discussion by announcing that he would veto both of the legislative proposals that have actually been introduced as real bills. SB 840, by far the most carefully crafted, transparent and fully vetted bill, will remain in the Legislature until next year, since sending it down to him for a veto would end any consideration of single payer until 2009. The individual mandate provisions in the Governor’s pronouncement are being emphatically rejected by virtually all stakeholders representing the people who would be forced to pay uncapped premiums. The percentages to be paid by employers and individuals, hospitals and doctors, people in a “pool” and those outside, those above differing percentages of the poverty scale and those below, are so far apart in the Governor’s pronouncements and the Speaker’s bill, you could drive trucks through the gaps. The Governor’s lynchpin financial mechanism of a provider tax remains submerged under the very murky water of a 2/3 vote. What convoluted compromise might be devised in a last-minute attempt is anyone’s guess.

Nonetheless, we are told that, unless we agree to pass a yet-to-be hastily drafted bill that incidentally may be the biggest reform proposal ever attempted in health care, and pass it in two weeks, thus completely bypassing the entire political process and any semblance of open public input, we’ve completely failed and health reform is doomed forever. Please.

The prospect of legislative staff, sitting behind closed doors, hastily crafting a 100-page health reform “compromise”, to be pushed through the legislature with little or no public input over the course of the next 14 days, is deeply irresponsible. Frankly, given the example of the energy deregulation bill, we ought to know better.

Moreover, we lose nothing by taking advantage of the fact that the sessions of the California legislature are two year sessions. Many of our major accomplishments, most recently, AB 32, the bill related to greenhouse gas, took more than one year to achieve. Next year’s Presidential campaigns will ensure that health reform stays as the top of the agenda. More importantly, the issue of health reform will continue to dominate because the people need it and want it. What they want, and deserve, however, is responsible health reform, not a new debacle that benefits the health insurance companies the way the electricity bill benefited Enron.

Finally, we must not forget the reason that we are in this crisis to begin with. Health care premiums changed by insurance companies continue to grow 3-4 times faster than wages. A solution is needed that pays attention to adequate funding, affordability, cost controls and quality.

Even if the Legislature should pass a last minute convoluted experiment in health reform, there will still be a need to continue the work to enact a fully vetted, Medicare-like single payer system that replaces the insurance companies with a plan for all Californians, allows each person to choose their own providers, and protects affordability, comprehensive coverage and quality. Such a solution is the only sensible and tested way to achieve universal health care responsibly. Whatever happens in the next two weeks, the movement for single payer universal health care is continuing to grow, and SB 840 will continue as its focal point, the only legislation that establishes the kind of truly universal, modern and affordable health care system the people of California need and deserve.

For more information, please go to Senator Kuehl’s website at www.sen.ca.gov/kuehl

GOVERNOR, VOTE US OUT OF IRAQ!

LACDP urges every citizen to call or write the Governor immediately to ask that he sign Senate Bill 924 – the Vote Us Out bill. The measure would make California the first state in the nation to vote on whether President Bush should immediately withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq.

We need every Californian who’s sick and tired of waiting for George Bush to bring our troops home to urge the Governor to sign Vote Us Out today!

In his own letter to the Governor, Senator Perata reminded him of his public statements in opposition to the war – and his longstanding commitment to put important questions to a vote of the people. “Your statements urging an end to the war garnered national attention,” Perata wrote. “Regrettably, the voices of everyday Californians – mothers and fathers, husbands and wives, sons and daughters of soldiers serving in Iraq – aren’t being heard.”

Vote Us Out gives us a voice in bringing this war to an end. Please, call the Governor now – and urge your friends and relatives to join this effort!

P.S. We know that George Bush and his allies will pressure the Governor to veto Vote Us Out – that’s why the Governor has to hear the other side – from Californians who want an end to this war!

P.P.S. Here’s how to contact the Governor:

By Phone: (916) 445-2841
By Fax: (916) 445-4633
To email the Governor online, go to: http://gov.ca.gov/interact

By regular mail:
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Please call or write now! Vote Us Out of Iraq!

Statement from California Democratic Party Chairman Art Torres calling on Governor Schwarzenegger to sign SB 924, allow voters to voice their opinion on Iraq

“Regardless of the Governor’s views on the war in Iraq, California voters deserve the right to have their voices be heard. In this war that has now claimed more than 3,700 American troops, Californians have suffered the largest toll, having lost more than 400 of our own in Iraq.

“Recent polling shows that two out of three Californians support either withdrawing some or all of the U.S. troops now stationed in Iraq.

“The self-proclaimed ‘People’s Governor’ owes it to the people of California, our troops and their loved ones to let the voice of the voters be heard.”

# # #

Following is an editorial from today’s Orange County Register:

Let Californians be heard on Iraq
There’s no good reason not to have a referendum on the Feb. 5 ballot.
An Orange County Register Editorial

It is difficult to imagine what great harm would be done by having a measure on California’s ballot in February calling on President Bush to begin the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. It would provide a snapshot of public opinion on what is shaping up to be the key national issue of the day. And it could spark more discussion among the people rather than the politicians.

The state Assembly voted Monday to put such a referendum on the Feb. 5 ballot. Since the Senate passed a slightly different version in June, it has been sent back to the Senate. Once the Senate agrees, it will go the Gov. Schwarzenegger’s desk for signature or veto. The governor hasn’t made up his mind and is said to be a little leery of having to address the issue.

He should go ahead and sign it.

One of the consequences of never having had a formal declaration of war (as we still believe the Constitution requires) before invading Iraq is that the kind of far-ranging discussion that should have preceded such a drastic step was short-circuited. A referendum in California would have no power to bind or mandate the president. But it would offer him and his advisers important information about how the people view the Iraq war almost five years on. Not that California is necessarily representative of the nation as a whole, but the views of Californians are not unimportant.

The most childish reason to oppose putting such a referendum on the ballot is the argument that even discussing the idea of troop withdrawal will hurt morale in the military in Iraq and perhaps even endanger the troops. There’s little or no reason to suspect this is true. We’ve read interviews with soldiers and Marines who support the mission passionately. We’ve read interviews with military people in Iraq who have become deeply disillusioned with the war – or convinced that the Iraqi people don’t want what America is offering as badly as the administration wants to offer it – and would welcome immediate withdrawal. We’re in no position to know the precise breakdown, but soldiers in Iraq have more than one monolithic viewpoint.

The one thing we’re quite sure of us that whatever they may think privately of their mission, the men and women on duty in Iraq are professional and well-trained enough that learning some people back home are questioning the wisdom of the war will not turn them into quivering blobs of self-pity and remorse who simply won’t be able to carry on. They have much more important (and threatening) things to worry about. The notion that their morale would crumble if such a referendum were held is a profound insult to them.

Even if a referendum on the war will have no immediate practical effect, it will provide valuable information. If it helps to inspire more wide-ranging and passionate (but civil and informed, we hope) discussion and debate, it will serve the purpose of strengthening civil society back home.

Governor Signs 2007-08 Budget

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the 2007-08 Budget into law on Friday, August 24. The Governor vetoed $703 million in General Fund spending, extensively cutting healthcare and socila service programs.

A new California Budget Project summary reviews the Governor’s vetoes, changes in the final budget agreement as compared to the plan passed by the Assembly in July, and reviews key policy changes in the budget.

To read more go to www.cbp.org

To link directly to the Governor’s summary of the 2007-08 Budget and a listing of his vetoes go to: http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/pdf/Enacted/BudgetSummary/FullBudgetSummary.pdf.

« Previous PageNext Page »